Menjana kemenangan BA dalam tahun 2004

The following piece was originally written for a guest column in a special issu of Newsweek on "Race". A shorter edited version has now appeared in the magazine for 18th September 2000.

RACE – ARE WE TO BLAME? 

Dr Syed Husin Ali

I happen to share the view that “Race” is a myth. The idea is constructed by human beings themselves, often by small minorities greedy for wealth and power. A recent genome project has revealed that there is actually no scientific basis for race or for categorizing humankind according to racial differences. Nevertheless, there are still many who see themselves and others as separate from one another because of differences in their origins, religion, culture, skin color and so forth.

History has shown that mankind is capable of living peacefully side by side in mutual respect. But sadly, there have been many examples nowadays of racial or ethnic conflicts and even genocide. We hear gruesome stories of racial killings from all over the world, like in Bosnia, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Mindanao, Acheh, Maluku and Fiji. The conflicting groups there have similarities as well as differences. It has become evident that in some of these places religion, which teaches love and brotherhood, has ironically been widely used recently to create racial hatred.

Such hatred can be easily exacerbated when there exists unfair distribution of wealth and resources. Concentration of wealth largely in the hands of a few identified as one racial or ethnic group and abject poverty among the majority in another group, can be the main root of tension and conflict. Further, whenever there is an attempt to deny equal access to economic opportunities on the basis of race or ethnicity, then the situation can become more serious. Any political act by one ethnic group to suppress another group in order to maintain its political and economic dominance will certainly invite resistance, which can lead to racial hatred and violence.

In Malaysia the politics of race or ethnicity have been sedulously nurtured, and permeates every level and sector of society. I remember, twenty two months after being detained without trial under the Internal Security Act, I was taken from the detention camp at Kamunting to an unknown holding center in Kuala Lumpur, about 200 km away. Over a week earlier, two deputy ministers, two senior journalists and three opposition politicians had been detained under the same draconian act, victims of power struggle within the leading party (UMNO) within the ruling coalition. They wanted to pressurize me to implicate one side of this struggle with the communist underground, although they knew I had no communist connections.

At the holding center I was kept in solitary confinement for more than half a year. During the first month, I was often denied sleep for long hours and not allowed to wear decent clothes or use spectacles. Teams of Malay Special Branch officers rigorously and continuously interrogated me. They wanted me to cooperate by confirming that I was an intermediary between the communist underground with the then Deputy Prime Minister, who is currently Prime Minister of Malaysia. I denied ever being an intermediary of any sort for any one. I was accused of refusing to cooperate and consequently slapped and spat on the face. They warned me that if I continued to be stubborn, they would hand me over to a Chinese team, which they said could be more heartless to one not of their kind. It was ironical that even within the walls of that secret center, these officers had to resort to racial threat to force me into submission.

In this country Malays, Chinese, Indians and indigenous communities live together, though each group has a distinct history, religion, culture and language. The political institutions that have been established are designed to keep them apart. But the process of integration has also been taking place, thanks to largely common education, increasing economic cooperation and a certain degree of power sharing, although more confined to the top strata of society. There is also a growing middle class that is greatly influenced by common westernized style of life. Nevertheless, ethnic fears and suspicions still linger, which can easily be ignited into fiery conflicts by intense inter-ethnic competition, particularly in the economic and political spheres.

There has been a common stereotyping that the Malays are poor, but control political power, while the Chinese control the economy. In reality, different ethnic groups are involved within the ruling political elite, although admittedly the Malays play a more dominant role politically. At the same time large number of Malays, as the majority in the other ethnic groups too, are denied significant participation in political decision making except only to vote once in every four or five years.

On the other hand, although Chinese are comparatively more dominant in traditional businesses are very rich and some of them very rich, other ethnic groups also participate to form the economic elite. Now, a growing number of Malays, who are able to take advantage of the government policy of positive discrimination favoring Malays, have managed to become very wealthy. A handful of Malay families now have the commanding heights of new industries. They form a powerful alliance with Chinese and Indian families in business. The billionaires in Malaysia are of all ethnic groups, and share a common dependence on government patronage. At the same time, foreign capital still plays an important part.

In the country, there is no space for democratic activism and civil society is restricted to each ethnic group. This is enforced by the Internal Security Act, that allows the government to detain a person indefinitely without trial, the Printing Presses and Publication Act, that makes independent publication virtually impossible, and draconian interpretations of the Sedition Act, that suffocates public discussion. I am not suggesting these laws have been deliberately used to divide ethnic groups, but they do stifle change, which can create social and ethnic animosity.

Ethnic differences and similarities are often opportunistically used in the political processes, for determining, perpetrating, or capturing power and influence in the economic and political fields. The present ruling coalition, known as the Barisan Nasional (BN), appears to be multi-ethnic in form but in fact, each of its thirteen component members represent exclusively only one ethnic group and its interests. Each party uses its own ethnic appeal to mobilize support for the BN. In several elections the ruling coalition has been known to resort to ethnic fears of the domination of the other ethnic groups in order to win general support of the people.

During the last general elections in November 1999, the ruling BN, sensing that it was losing support from Malays (largely due to their anger at PM Mahathir Mohamad’s mistreatment of Anwar Ibrahim, his former deputy), adopted the strategy of winning over the non-Malays, especially Chinese and Indians. The media, monopolized more than ever during the election campaigns, were widely used to spread government propaganda and discredit the opposition. They were also manipulated to arouse fear that there would be ethnic conflicts if the opposition won. Lately, in order to recover lost ground among the Malays, the government has again used the media it controls to create fear among the Malays that the non-Malays are challenging their “special positions”, which are entrenched in the Constitution as positive discrimination measures.

During the 1999 elections tension ran high, but fortunately they passed without any incident. In contrast, during the 1969 elections, ethnically charged campaigns, threat of the BN losing power in a state, and fear that Malay political power was being challenged, led to a bloody post-election ethnic carnage. Unfortunately, similar dangerous racial strategy has always proven successful in returning the government to power. But it causes deep schisms within society, which make it difficult to forge national unity.

We know that conflicts and killings occur when one group tries to use race in order perpetrate its racial superiority and control over economic and political power. But we do not know of any easy solution to these problems. Nevertheless, in the context of Malaysia and perhaps many other countries too, the establishment of social justice and democracy can go a long way to improve the situation. By social justice, I mean a more equitable distribution of wealth. By democracy, I mean broader civil liberties, greater freedom and more people’s participation in decision making process.

There is need to promote ethnic cooperation and interdependence in economic activities, and establishment of transracial institutions cutting across ethnic barriers, at all levels. And, of course it is also necessary to disseminate universal values and attitudes, which can help people so that they do not succumb easily to racial or ethnic appeals. Until racial and ethnic harmony comes naturally, it must be worked at.

 
Sampaikan informasi dan maklumat kepada mindarakyat@hotmail.com
OX Free Counter
OX Free Counter